I-T goes into flashback mode

The proposed amendment (Amendment 911) to the Income-Tax Act with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, that would allow the authorities to tax transactions like Vodafone’s acquisition of Hutch, among others, has thrown up several vexed issues. The move as announced by the union finance minister Pranab Mukherjee in his Budget, is also expected to have far reaching impact on foreign institutional investments into the country as well.

“One of the most significant amendments regarding taxability of cross-border M&A transaction involving indirect transfer of share or interest in an Indian company is sought to be laid to rest. Surprisingly, a retrospective amendment effective 1962 to a controversial issue that attracted global attention finds no mention either in finance minister’s speech or in the Memorandum to the Bill. The conviction of the government is evident and its intent to arrest application of Supreme Court decision in Vodafone’s case in similarly concluded transactions is clear. The tendency of the government to make retrospective amendments on substantial legal and interpretational issues is reflective of an aggressive tax policy and a signal to investors to desist from aggressive tax planning,” Mr Vipul Jhaveri, partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells, said.

An official communique from Vodafone said, “We are examining this proposed decision with our lawyers, but we do not believe this retrospective change in tax law should have any impact on the final judgment handed down by the Supreme Court in our tax case. We continue to have faith in the Indian judicial system.”

It may be mentioned that the FM has almost quietly inserted an amendment to provisions of the Income-Tax Act to tax overseas transfer of shares that hold underlying assets in India like in the Vodafone situation. The government plans to enforce the amendment with retrospective effect from 1962. Mr R S Gujral, finance secretary, said that transactions like Vodafone are subject to taxes in India.

“The new amendment is only a clarification reiterating the point that such transactions are to be taxed in India,” he clarified. He said that the 10 per cent withholding tax should have been levied on Vodafone. The Centre expects to recover Rs35,000-Rs40,000 crore from cases similar to Vodafone and that the figure included Voda-fone, Mr Gujral said.

Ruling that favoured Vodafone
The Supreme Court, on January 20, had ruled that Vodafone, the British telecom company does not have to pay taxes and penalties for the transaction that saw the company acquire 67 per cent stake in Hutchison Essar, a mobile phone operator in India in 2007.

The deal was for 55,000 crore. The apex court ruling was on grounds that Indian tax officials do not have jurisdiction over a deal between two global companies, even if the assets involved in that deal are located in India.

Post new comment

<form action="/comment/reply/134576" accept-charset="UTF-8" method="post" id="comment-form"> <div><div class="form-item" id="edit-name-wrapper"> <label for="edit-name">Your name: <span class="form-required" title="This field is required.">*</span></label> <input type="text" maxlength="60" name="name" id="edit-name" size="30" value="Reader" class="form-text required" /> </div> <div class="form-item" id="edit-mail-wrapper"> <label for="edit-mail">E-Mail Address: <span class="form-required" title="This field is required.">*</span></label> <input type="text" maxlength="64" name="mail" id="edit-mail" size="30" value="" class="form-text required" /> <div class="description">The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.</div> </div> <div class="form-item" id="edit-comment-wrapper"> <label for="edit-comment">Comment: <span class="form-required" title="This field is required.">*</span></label> <textarea cols="60" rows="15" name="comment" id="edit-comment" class="form-textarea resizable required"></textarea> </div> <fieldset class=" collapsible collapsed"><legend>Input format</legend><div class="form-item" id="edit-format-1-wrapper"> <label class="option" for="edit-format-1"><input type="radio" id="edit-format-1" name="format" value="1" class="form-radio" /> Filtered HTML</label> <div class="description"><ul class="tips"><li>Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.</li><li>Allowed HTML tags: &lt;a&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;strong&gt; &lt;cite&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;dl&gt; &lt;dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt;</li><li>Lines and paragraphs break automatically.</li></ul></div> </div> <div class="form-item" id="edit-format-2-wrapper"> <label class="option" for="edit-format-2"><input type="radio" id="edit-format-2" name="format" value="2" checked="checked" class="form-radio" /> Full HTML</label> <div class="description"><ul class="tips"><li>Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.</li><li>Lines and paragraphs break automatically.</li></ul></div> </div> </fieldset> <input type="hidden" name="form_build_id" id="form-08270e4300b6bfb537fae334d629d6c7" value="form-08270e4300b6bfb537fae334d629d6c7" /> <input type="hidden" name="form_id" id="edit-comment-form" value="comment_form" /> <fieldset class="captcha"><legend>CAPTCHA</legend><div class="description">This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.</div><input type="hidden" name="captcha_sid" id="edit-captcha-sid" value="84725454" /> <input type="hidden" name="captcha_response" id="edit-captcha-response" value="NLPCaptcha" /> <div class="form-item"> <div id="nlpcaptcha_ajax_api_container"><script type="text/javascript"> var NLPOptions = {key:'c4823cf77a2526b0fba265e2af75c1b5'};</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://call.nlpcaptcha.in/js/captcha.js" ></script></div> </div> </fieldset> <span class="btn-left"><span class="btn-right"><input type="submit" name="op" id="edit-submit" value="Save" class="form-submit" /></span></span> </div></form>

No Articles Found

No Articles Found

No Articles Found

I want to begin with a little story that was told to me by a leading executive at Aptech. He was exercising in a gym with a lot of younger people.

Shekhar Kapur’s Bandit Queen didn’t make the cut. Neither did Shaji Karun’s Piravi, which bagged 31 international awards.