Egypt’s vice-president Omar Suleiman met a broad representation of major Opposition groups for the first time on Sunday and offered new concessions, including freedom of the press, release of those detained since anti-government protests began nearly two weeks ago and the eventual lifting of the country’s hated emergency laws. Two of the groups that attended the meeting said this was only a first step in a dialogue which has yet to meet their central demand — the immediate ouster of longtime President Hosni Mubarak.

“People still want the President to step down,” said Mostafa al-Naggar, a protest organiser and supporter of Mohamed ElBaradei, a Nobel laureate and one of the country’s leading democracy advocates. “The protest continues because there are no guarantees and not all demands have been met,” he added.
“We did not sign on to the statement. This is a beginning of a dialogue. We approve the positive things in the statement but ... we are still demanding that the President step down.”
The outlawed Muslim Brotherhood, the country’s largest Opposition group, made a similar statement after its representatives attended the meeting.
The vice-president offered to set up a committee of judiciary and political figures to study proposed constitutional reforms that would allow more candidates to run for President and impose term limits on the presidency, the state news agency reported. The committee was given until the first week of March to finish the tasks.
The offer also included a pledge not to harass those participating in anti-government protests, which have drawn hundreds of thousands at the biggest rallies. The government agreed not to hamper freedom of the press and not to interfere with text messaging and the Internet.
The meeting drew the broadest representation of Egypt’s fragmented Opposition to sit with the new vice-president since the protests began on January 25. The new offer of concessions followed a series of others that would have been unimaginable just a month ago in this tightly-controlled country.
All appear geared to placate the protesters and relieve international pressure without giving in to the one demand that unites all the Opposition — Mr Mubarak’s immediate departure. The latest agreement makes no mention of any plan for Mr Mubarak to step before a new election is held later this year.
Since the protests began, Mr Mubarak has pledged publicly for the first time that he will not seek re-election. The government promised that his son Gamal, who had widely been expected to succeed him, would also not stand. Mr Mubarak appointed a vice-president for the first time since he took office three decades ago, widely considered his designated successor. He sacked his Cabinet, named a new one and promised reforms.
On Saturday, the top leaders of the ruling party, including Gamal Mubarak, were purged. There were signs that the paralysis that has gripped the country since the crisis began was easing on Sunday, the first day of the week
in Egypt. Some schools reopened for the first time in more than a week, and banks did the same for only three hours with long lines outside. However, there is still a night curfew, and tanks ringing the city’s central square and guarding government buildings, embassies and other important institutions.
At the epicentre of the protests, Tahrir Square in central
Cairo, some activists said they had slept under Army tanks ringing the plaza for fear they would try to evict them or further confine the area for demonstrations. The crowd of thousands in the morning swelled steadily over the day to tens of thousands in the late afternoon.
Many were exhausted and wounded from fighting to stand their ground for more than a week in the square. “We are determined to press on until our number one demand is met,” said Khaled Abdul-Hameed, a representative of the protesters. He said the activists have formed a 10-member “Coalition of the Youths of Egypt’s Revolution,” to relay
their positions to politicians and public figures negotiating with the regime. “The regime is retreating. It is making more concessions everyday,” Abdul-Hameed said.
Mr Mubarak is insisting he cannot stand down now or it would only deepen the chaos in his country. The United States shifted signals and gave key backing to the regime’s gradual changes on Saturday, warning of the dangers if Mr Mubarak goes too quickly. The Opposition groups represented at the meeting included the youthful supporters of Mr ElBaradei, who are one of the main forces organising the protests. Mr ElBaradei was not invited and his brother said the statement by those who did
attend does not represent his personal view.
The Muslim Brotherhood and a number of smaller leftist, liberal groups also attended, according to footage shown on state television.
The government offered to open an office that would field complaints about political prisoners, according to the state news agency. It also pledged to commission judicial authorities to fight corruption and prosecute those behind it. In another concession, the authorities promised to investigate and prosecute those responsible for the yet
unexplained disappearance of the police from Cairo’s streets more than a week ago, which unleashed a wave of lawless looting and arson.
The offer to eventually lift emergency laws when security permits would fulfil a longtime demand by the Opposition. The laws were imposed by Mr Mubarak when he took office in 1981 and they have been in force ever since. They give police far-reaching powers for detention
and suppression of civil and human rights.
The government agreed to set up a committee that includes public and independent figures and specialists and representatives of youth movements to monitor the “honest implementation” of all the new agreements and to report back and give recommendations to Mr Suleiman.
Before the meetings, the Muslim Brotherhood made clear it would insist on Mr Mubarak’s immediate ouster. The fundamentalist Islamic group, which has been outlawed since 1954 but fields candidates in parliamentary elections
as Independents, did not organise or lead the protests currently under way and only publicly threw its support behind them a few days into the movement. It only ordered its supporters to take part when it sensed that the protesters, mostly young men and women using social
networks on the Internet to mobilise, were able to sustain their momentum.
There have been no known discussions between the Brotherhood and the regime in years — one of many startling shifts in policy after years of crackdowns by the Western-backed regime against the Islamists. Both Mr Mubarak and Mr Suleiman have blamed the Brotherhood as well as foreigners of fomenting the recent unrest. Mr Mubarak is known to have little or no tolerance for Islamist groups and the decision to open talks with the Brotherhood is a tacit recognition by his regime of their key role in the ongoing protests as well as their wide popular base.
In Cairo, home to 18 million people, there were some signs of a return to normalcy. Traffic was back to near regular levels and more stores reopened across the city, including some on the streets leading to Tahrir Square. Protesters greeted some store owners and people returning to work with flowers. In Zamalek, an affluent island in the middle of the Nile that is home to many foreign embassies, food outlets reopened and pizza delivery boys checked their motorbikes. Employees at a KFC restaurant wiped down tables. Hairdressers and beauty salons called their patrons to let them know they were reopening.
n US welcomes move: US secretary of state Hillary Clinton cautiously welcomed the talks, reports AFP. “Today we learned the Muslim Brotherhood decided to participate, which suggests they at least are now involved in the dialogue that we have encouraged,” Ms Clinton told National Public Radio from Germany. “We’re going to wait and see how this develops, but we’ve been very clear about what we expect,” she said.
n Opaque, says ElBaradei: Mr Mohamed ElBaradei said he was “not invited” to take part in the negotiations, and criticised the talks as “opaque”. He told NBC-TV in an interview: “I have not been invited to take part in the negotiations or dialogue, but I have been following what has been going on. The process is opaque, nobody knows who is talking to who(m) at this stage.”