The BCCI probe panel on the Indian Premier League spot-fixing and betting charges — struck down as “illegal” — was set up in violation of its own rules, the Bombay high court said, adding a prima facie case is made out that BCCI president-in-exile N. Srinivasan was involved in its formation.
The two-member panel that probed the charges against India Cements Ltd, owners of IPL franchise Chennai Super Kings, its former team principal Gurunath Meiyappan, son-in-law of Mr Srinivasan, and Raj Kundra, co-owner of Rajasthan Royals on July 28, had given a clean chit to all those against whom the probe was conducted. The court, which struck down the panel as “illegal and unconstitutional” in a severe blow to BCCI and Mr Srinivasan, however, refrained from ordering a new committee of retired judges.
It held that forming a new probe commission was the prerogative of the BCCI. “The (probe) commission was not duly constituted and was contrary to and in violation of the provisions of Rules 2.2 and 3 of Section 6 of the Operational Rules (of BCCI),” said Justices M.S. Sonak and S.F. Vajifdar in a 61-page verdict delivered on Tuesday which may thwart Mr Srinivasan’s bid to regain full control of the BCCI. The court was hearing a PIL filed by the Cricket Association of Bihar and its secretary Aditya Verma challenging the constitution of the commission set up by BCCI and IPL governing council after the betting and fixing scandal surfaced.
“...These are indeed very serious allegations in a matter which is even more serious. On this issue the most that can be said in favour of the petitioner at this stage and in this proceeding is that it has made out a prima-facie case that Srinivasan was involved in the formation of the commission,” the bench said. The panel comprised two former judges of the Madras high court — Justices T. Jayarama Chouta and R. Balasubramanian.