Burhanuddin Rabbani, who heads a panel which has the Afghanistan government’s mandate to negotiate peace with the Taliban, will not mind using the good offices of India for finding a political solution to the strife in his country.
India is an important country in the region and we want its cooperation in peace and reconciliation in Afghanistan, Mr Rabbani said on the occasion of his talks with external affairs minister S.M. Krishna in New Delhi on Thursday.
Mr Rabbani is on a four-day visit to India.
Afghans should not be victims in the hands of others to be used against the Afghan people themselves, Mr Rabbani said without elaborating. He noted that regional countries had a role in promoting peace in Afghanistan. India was expected to discuss the situation in Afghanistan with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton when she visits New Delhi next week.
Talking to journalists, US charge d’affaires Peter Burleigh said Afghanistan could figure “prominently” in the Clinton-Krishna talks, in which the relations between and among the US, India and Pakistan will be “thoroughly covered”.
Mr Burleigh described the Taliban reconciliation talks as a “very important issue” for the US and India alike.
The US was keeping India informed of the substance of the “very preliminary discussions” that have taken place with the Taliban interlocutors.
The diplomat went on to note that the negotiations for “reaching an understanding” with “some Taliban elements” were making “slow process”, and the talks could be expected to “continue for months”.
“The US is continuing to explore and it will keep India directly informed and also seek advice,” Mr Burleigh said.
The situation in West Asia, North Africa, and East and Southeast Asia, was also likely to be discussed in the second strategic dialogue between Ms Clinton and Mr Krishna on July 19.
Replying to a question about the possible implications of the US losing out on a multi-billion tender for fighter jets for the Indian Air Force, on the defence cooperation with India, Mr Burleigh said “one contract here and there does not make or break (the) relationship” and that the US was in it for the long-term.