On the GOM issue in the 2G spectrum case, the Cabinet Secretary sent three letters to the finance secretary and the same numbers of communications were sent back by the latter.
Apart from this, two letters of former communications minister Raja to the PM on February 28 and November 16, 2006, opposing referring of the spectrum price issue to the GOM were also placed on record. An identical letter of telecom secretary on June 15 to the finance ministry, explaining the reasons for not referring the spectrum price issue to the GOM, are expected to be examined by the top court on Tuesday.
The documents revealed that the Cabinet Secretariat had been consistently asking the finance ministry to refer the spectrum issue to the GOM and it was even supported by the DEA till its latest referred communication of June 6, 2007. But the January 30, 2008 meeting between Mr Chidambaram and Mr Raja seemed to have finally clinched the issue by deciding the price fixation without placing before the GOM.
The minutes of the January 30, 2008 meeting, which the government earlier said did not exist, but now placed on record by Mr Swamy, stated that “finance minister (Mr Chidambaram in the meeting) said that for now, we are not seeking to revisit the current regimes for entry fee for revenue sharing”.
It was noted in the meeting between the two ministers that “there is a mismatch in the demand and supply of spectrum across circles. Redressing this mismatch will be another policy imperative,” the minutes recorded by the then finance secretary D. Subbarao said.
Mr Swamy had alleged that the January 30 meeting between Mr Chidambaram and Mr Raja proved the “clincher” for fixing the price at `1,650 crores as base entry fee for 2G spectrum, which was the price actually fixed in 2001.